Stock investments ranging from Biotech, Pharmaceutical, and Medical Devices in the Healthcare Sector. Covering Clinical Trial recommendations and FDA Approvals.
9/4/09
Glaxo's cancer vaccine inches toward approval--Merck's Cervarix vs GSK Gardasil.
By MATTHEW PERRONE - AP Business Writer
Published: Fri, Sep. 04, 2009
WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators said Friday that a GlaxoSmithKline vaccine prevents the leading cause of cervical cancer in women, bringing the company one step closer to competing with Merck's blockbuster Gardasil, which has controlled the U.S. market for three years. GlaxoSmithKline(GSK) Google Finance
In documents posted online, the Food and Drug Administration said Cervarix - Glaxo's vaccine against human papilloma virus or HPV - successfully blocked the two leading strains of the virus nearly 93 percent of the time.
But even as the British drugmaker moves closer to competing in the U.S., Merck is poised to begin marketing Gardasil to boys and men. In a separate review, the FDA said that vaccine prevented genital warts in males 90 percent of the time.
The agency will ask a panel of vaccine experts next week to weigh in on both vaccines. The FDA is not required to follow the group's advice, though it usually does.
While Merck has suggested the approval for boys could double the potential market for Gardasil, Leerink Swann analyst Seamus Fernandez said the benefit likely will be minimal.
Genital warts caused by HPV usually clear up by themselves, and the cancers caused by the virus are extremely rare in men.
"If it's not preventing something serious like cervical cancer and there are questions about safety, I think parents' acceptance of the vaccine in young boys might be less urgent than for their girls," said Fernandez.
Glaxo has won a number of government contracts for Cervarix in Europe, but its U.S. launch was delayed in 2007 when the FDA said it needed more data about the vaccine. Earlier studies of Cervarix showed a higher number of muscular and neurological problems among patients who used the vaccine compared with an alternate treatment.
The FDA said Friday that outside experts have now determined Cervarix did not cause those problems.
"The conclusion in the case of each of these efforts was that the data are not sufficient to establish a link," the agency said in its review.
FDA reviewers also noted a slightly higher rate of miscarriages in women taking Cervarix, but said "the data do not establish a causal relationship."
Glaxo wants its vaccine approved for girls and women ages 10 to 25. The FDA is expected to make a decision on the vaccine later this year, but analysts say London-based Glaxo may still have trouble making inroads into the U.S. market.
Gardasil and Cervarix both defend against HPV strains 16 and 18, which cause about 70 percent of cervical cancer cases. But Merck's vaccine also defends against two other HPV types that cause 90 percent of genital warts, something Cervarix does not target.
The most common side effects with both vaccines were pain and swelling at the injection site.
Gardasil became an early success story for Merck after its 2006 launch, achieving sales that are rare for a vaccine. The company has sold about 50 million doses worldwide, with more than $1.4 billion in revenue last year.
But sales have been slowing amid questions about the longevity of the vaccine's effect and its price tag of nearly $400. In the most recent quarter, Gardasil sales fell to $268 million, down 18 percent from the prior year period.
A government-funded study last year found that the HPV vaccine is cost-effective for young teens, but not for women in their 20s. And labeling for the vaccine notes that the "duration of protection of Gardasil has not been established." Company trials have only tracked immunity out to five years after receiving the three-injection regimen.
Whitehouse, N.J.-based Merck will make the case on Sept. 9 for approving the vaccine for boys and men ages 9 to 26.
Labels:
Cervarix,
Cervical cancer,
FDA,
Gardasil,
GlaxoSmithKline,
HPV vaccine,
Human papillomavirus,
Merck
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.